I did not realize that wikis could take on so many forms and serve so many purposes. The extent of my knowledge until now of a wiki was Wikipedia (which I always advised my children not to use because of the "anyone can edit" feature.) Now, I'm a bit torn about that aspect and investigating these three wikis will help me explain why....
Davis Wiki: A community wiki for Davis California.
I love the way this wiki is set up. It looks more like a newsletter than a wiki and is very inviting. The graphics & video that were chosen are purposeful (the map of the city's location, the video that explains all about what the wiki is for and how it was developed.) These are key elements because they allow you to process information in various ways (read it, see it, hear it.) These features add dimension to the information and show people that they can contribute to the wiki in a variety of ways.
The Aristotle Experiment: A course organization tool for Estancia High School
Compared to the Davis wiki, this one is very simplistic in the way it's presented but it is thorough and well thought out. It lays out most every detail of the school year's curriculum and breaks it down literally, to the day. Though I'm sure there were adjustments made as the year progressed, how wonderful is it that parents, administrators and of course students have access to your whole year at the click of the mouse. My favorite feature is the projects page where you find the project's purpose, procedure, rubrics and all complete with a nice visual of the text or topic to welcome you in. I would love to create a wiki for my classes like this one. I do wonder how much of this wiki was edited by the students to make it more appealing to them?
Study Hall: A student generated phenomenon motivated by "Cool Cat Teacher"
This wiki is what it's all about. Students learning from and growing with each other in the name of education, collaboration and respect for the knowledge of peers. WOW! Imagine having access to what someone knows who has tested, read or written before you in order to be prepared, proactive and productive for you course's challenges! Even further and deeper is the student commitment to providing and supporting one another in this way. They are really putting themselves out there and welcoming vulnerability by saying "look, here's what I think you need to know. Correct me if I'm wrong." I love the Peanuts' cartoons they use to add a little Spanish humor, the weekly agenda complete with homework & supplementary support links and most of all I love the "student tone" of the work. You can hear them talking to each other as you read. I just couldn't hear the teacher and am not sure if that's a positive or negative?
One thing I noticed about all three of these wikis was the links to blogs which was interesting and empowering. Within wiki's open forum where "everyone can," there is still a place, the blog, for opinions & talk that you just can't touch.
Now what would I do? I would combine the elements of these three: the format from the first, the organization of the second and the students' voices of the third to create what I would consider the "Perfect Wiki Storm." I grab the students with the wiki "wow I didn't know it could do all that", lay out what I think should be the law and then invite them to Debate, Create and Elaborate. I know I'd have to be very careful because there are untouchable standards required by the state and the district. However, "DCE" issues could revolve around style and choice of presentation, study guides, projects & collaborative works, test organization etc. Could we handle it? I don't know but I can't wait to try!...SPCG